What if Humans and Nature are One and the Same?

Humans ARE part of the environment…

I’ll say that again: Humans ARE part of the environment. We’re not the evil ogres that we’re made out to be. Bear with me as I explain.

I find it interesting when I turn on the television and a program about Nature is playing on one of the documentary or variety channels, one of the most universal messages they have to communicate to the viewing audience is that humans are BAD.

Regular villains we are. Where ever we go, bad things happen. We’re brutes according to them. Selfish oafs with no useful purpose. And we HARM everything and everyone. We MUST be reeled in. Controlled. Laws passed to keep us contained and chained.

The message above is a regular staple of these programs. They say it as if it is a documented truth and we’re all expected to feel a pang of guilt at our very existence because WE are the problem in the world. And some wise media person and television producer who likely never set foot outside of a city in their life are telling us to feel bad because we are destroyers and not creators.

We Humans have gotten a bad rap in the media. Some say we deserve it. And some of the message they communicate may be justified, but other criticisms that are leveled against us as a social norm are just plain weird and wrong. The sweeping statements of our guilt that are made are often pronouncements that are made so often that no one is challenging them. I am reminded of Star Trek The Next Generation where Q put Humanity on trial for it’s existence because the Q were threatened by human values and ideals. And the media is CLEARLY in the role of Q and judgment and sentencing has been passed without so much as a voice of opposition to speak in Humanity’s defense.

Until now.

Years ago, I grew up with family who lived and worked in and around the Sierra Nevada range of Northern California. And these were people who always talked about Forest Conservation and the role of people in preserving and maintaining the forest.

To them, we Humans were essential in maintaining the forest, serving in roles that we as a species had to take on because of our unintended actions in removing other caretakers who had once done these roles when there were no humans around. And now with these older caretaker species no longer doing the necessary roles that Nature demanded, we had to take on their duties to honor the land and Nature. And this covenant was openly discussed and, more importantly, practiced with honest and open hearts.

All in all, a simple and powerful system that endured for centuries and maintained something of a balance.

The people who I learned this from were hunters, fishermen, trappers, loggers, game wardens and ordinary people who spent their lives in the bush country and who each played a role in the system of keeping the forest healthy.

They taught the children these values and passed on their love of the land to future generations.

They had learned from their parents and parents-parents about valuing the land and did care about the health of the forests, deserts and prairies they lived in.

I remember stories my family told about the American Indians and the policies of many of their nations of keeping the forest healthy by burning off underbrush and keeping the forest more like a park than the tinder-box forests we now have that have been created by an overreaction to fire as a destructive force. Rather than to see fire’s true role as a creative force, they break out the fire trucks and never question if things could be any different. Some advancement in the approach to fire has been made over the years, but it is striking to see how terrible fires like the ones in Southern California have taken place that become firestorms and tragedies when a simple change to our view of fire and allowing humans to clean and clear the land in ecologically sane manners without punishment by governments would be an effective remedy.

Long-term thinking and action is needed to transform what is a rats nest of laws, well-meaning but lousy policies and plain greedy behavior into something closer to what the First Nations and early Europeans were practicing. They worked through their hearts and THEN through economics to live their philosophy of humans as a good part of our world. Not by passing knee-jerk laws, installing bureaucracies and pushing autocratic behavior divorced from reality upon the population.

I can hear the groans now and I’m standing my ground on this. Fire can be a creative force, if allowed to do it’s job without being immediately put out and seen as “bad”. Controlled burns and prescriptive burns are a step in the right direction, but to truly fix the issues we have, humans need to intervene and clean up the giant piles of deadwood and diseased and dead trees that detract from and actually harm the forest. So far, without naming names, I’ve seen organizations that claim to represent the Environment step in legally using the courts to prevent these needed actions and for the life of me, I can’t understand what kind of mentality leads these people to harm the very forests, deserts and temperate wild places they claim to love.

One need only to trace the roots of these decisions and it is always wise to use the old strategy of “Follow The Money” and you come right to the root of the problem. And “Money” isn’t the issue, since it is a tool that is a measure of life-energy being traded for a result or transaction to benefit two or more parties. That is ALL money has ever been. The issue here is who benefits in terms of life-energy by adopting nutty policies and behaviors that, on closer examination, do not make any sense at all?

Things to ponder. And if you are reading this and are angry at my challenging your assumptions, then GOOD! It is high time someone did so. You need to look at the basis of your beliefs and assumptions and sometimes it is uncomfortable to do so because you might find out your views have issues to be examined.

Another point in the whole Humans-are-bad-thinking morass that I have mixed feelings on is the “Leave No Trace” line of thinking. I’m not sure where this concept came from, but if one takes the initial premise that “Humans Are Bad” or “HAB-thinking” for short, then it is pretty clear that what is being said by the powers-that-be in all things Environmental, that humans ARE a problem and when walking or living outdoors, they should never leave ANY trace they have been there. That sounds fine in theory. But let’s examine this simple but deceptive viewpoint.

I can buy a portion of this argument for Leave-No-Trace. Pick up my trash, leave a place better than I found it, do my best not to step on rare plants, leave animals alone if I can avoid contact. I get it. But what I don’t buy into is being so paranoid in this concept as to worry to excess about where I step and even worrying about leaving footprints. I come across animal sign ALL the time and I can assure you that deer, bear, raccoons, even Bigfoot (yes – I’m including Bigfoot) are not terribly shy of leaving traces of their existence and they INTERACT in the environment by leaving traces of their passing.

Many of these interactions are needed by the ecosystem to function! So my point here is that if it is OK for these animals to leave a trace, why shouldn’t I be allowed to leave a footprint on occasion or interact and possibly benefit the environment because I am part of Nature too? It makes sense if I’m part of the environment and am a caretaker of said ecosystem to have some beneficial interaction with it!

I see web sites where people openly AGONIZE over whether to walk on a trail or not. Or how to step on this rock or that. One completely off the rails online discussion I read angrily went ballistic over a few painted trail signs on rocks that were deemed by purists to “harm the land” at a steep granite trail not far from where I live. Really? A little green paint hurt a rock?

Are you kidding me? The signs on the rocks kept people ON the trail and served as a virtue of leave-no-trace that the leave-no-trace crowd cannot bring themselves to claim as having value to keep people off other parts of the land?

Pardon me for laughing openly, but their utterly ridiculous points about little painted signs are null and void! It is this kind of logic of HAB-thinking that has me ready to scream when I see these things actually and seriously being discussed without the slightest bit of critical thought applied.

Critical Thought. That is the key in these discussions. The ability to look honestly and critically at behavior and ideas in a serious and honest debate and to reach valid and useful conclusions based on this honest examination. It is a rare thing to see these days. And even rarer when the subject of outdoor activities and the environment come into open discussion. And it is what you are experiencing now. Critical thinking to question assumptions.

Humans Are Bad… Poppycock!

The point I am making is that SOMEONE came up with this concept of “Humans are bad” and “Leave No Trace” and it became an overnight truth with few people ever questioning the assumptions and value of these views and policies as a basis of truth or wisdom.

They are neither.

Has anyone thought of a counterpoint to all of this HAB-thinking?

What ARE the right questions to be asking in the first place?

What if humans HAVE A VALID FUNCTION IN THE ENVIRONMENT? What if HAB-thinking is almost entirely wrong? That is the question to ask. What part of our behavior as a species does help Nature? And don’t start in about well intentioned (and mostly failed) laws, court-decisions or do-gooder organizations that claim to represent the environment that instead serve a more political role than any truly valuable assist to Nature. I challenge you to think about it and come to your own conclusions. And don’t go in with a view you cherish. Go in thinking “I’ll honestly examine both sides and follow the evidence” as Gill Grissom said so many times on the TV show “CSI”.

I’m talking about a good old-fashioned look to the past, and in some cases present, where humans DID help the land and had it in their hearts and values to enter into a sacred bond with Nature and to bypass the artificial and entirely useless legal frameworks that really do nothing to protect Nature and cause more harm than good.

Many First Nations peoples lived under this sacred bond. And quite a large number of European settlers came to appreciate and practice much of this philosophy as well. It was only in the past 40 years or so that the HAB-thinking came to dominate the discussion and locked the hands and minds of people from believing that THEY BELONGED IN THE ENVIRONMENT in the first place!

Perhaps I’m just being romantic in my thinking, but the most effective systems are often the simple ones. And if one sees humans as having a role in Nature to fulfill, then it places us in a much more creative and powerful position to work from than to adopt HAB-thinking and leave us bereft of choices and our only choice is to feel shame at our mere existence, which is what those who wish you to be powerless want from you.

If you don’t believe me, then go talk with the experts who lived with Forest and Land Conservation for centuries and who viewed the land as their Mother…

Let them teach you and hopefully, they’ll enlighten you to the fact that YOU are here for a reason and that you are GOOD… Not BAD.

And that YOU are part of Nature. Not apart from Her.

Communique #1 – Compassion and People

A few years back, I worked with a gentleman who was a very amazing intellect to work with and we clicked as friends and shared a great many experiences together at our common workplace.

He was a mentor to me and we collaborated often. I felt that we understood each other very well and our work together produced a lot of benefits for the company and our combined senses of humor were extremely sarcastic, but a lot of fun and it was one of those cases where you could just open up and be yourself.

He was an author and a writer with years of field experience in a wide range of topical matter and I had a lot of respect for his accomplishments and I learned a great deal from him in the three or so years I grew to know him.

It is one of those relationships that is a formative one with someone you know really makes an impact on you and you are glad that you met this person.

To make a long story short, the company I worked for was downsizing and in the summertime I realized we were all going to be outsourced and my friend met with me one day and was acting a little off. I couldn’t put my finger on it, but I realized I just needed to listen. He had gone through some medical challenges and the medicines had also had their effects on him. I had seen these same sorts of things in the past with my father’s long-term illness and was able to look past these little issues. This last day I met with him, he was actually a bit angry and took some personal shots at me and I just nodded and let these go since I was pretty sure he was just experiencing side effects from the medications he was taking.

He left me a brief email later that day and it was a short but somewhat odd “goodbye” kind of mail telling me I’d be A-Ok and had a bright future ahead of me. I was a little mystified but let it go and hoped I’d run into him the following day.

The next day I was made aware he had been let go and had already vacated his office. I called him repeatedly with no answer and figured it was just a reaction to the layoff, but as the days turned into weeks I realized that the pattern of rude behavior, anger and outbursts I had seen had actually gone back further than I cared to remember and I realized that there was a personal issue at work.

He had befriended me years earlier during a time when I was a key resource for getting things done and it struck me in hindsight that all those visits to his office and my willingness to provide help and technical support were likely something he used to feather his nest while I was led to believe we had a friendship and mentoring relationship.

Years have passed since that set of events, but I recently found his web site and noted he had a lot of things to say about people in general on one revealing page in particular. In particular, he had a lot to say about his real views of people.

The bottom line is that he wrote about how to use people who he felt were stupid. Literally a point by point instruction guide for how to put up with and then actually USE people for his own ends while looking down his nose at them! He painted himself to be their superior and yet never looks at the stupidity of his own assumptive behavior of how people are.

Human beings can be stupid one moment and then brilliant the next. it is all in context to so many variables that I cannot even compute them. His writing contained some truths to this point, but where I draw the line is that he espouses using people in the fashion he did and then he drops them like a hot rock when he has gotten everything out of them he can.

That behavior IS patently stupid. Yes, people can be challenging and they can engage in behaviors that we individually may find difficult to handle, but one has to remember there are two superior emotions that can literally cure the behavior that this person is exhibiting.

Compassion and Empathy.

I’ve dealt with people who used me, including this person who did this to me and I’ve had initial moments of anger at seeing how I was treated. But when you look deeper into these experiences and the reasons for them, you can find forgiveness for what they have done. It’s a hard thing to do.

Compassion and Empathy lead to Forgiveness and these free you from the trap of being angry at what you learn from someone who is treating you the way you were treated. And if you really think about it, it is a lesson you NEEDED to learn.

So the final emotions that follows from all of this is Thankfulness and Sorrow for the person or people causing the problem.

So… After having read his proud boasts of how to get rid of people he felt were not worthwhile, I have seen that I was one of those folks. And I forgive him as well but the most overriding emotion is sadness. Sadness for my friend and sadness for how he views the people around him.

My hope is that he changes his views before it is too late, but I suspect that he won’t be changing anytime soon.

It comes down to accepting people as they are, approaching them with an open heart and then working from there, always being honest but not being surprised at the things that happen.

May you run into good people on your journey who are compassion filled and honest to a fault. That is the only way a true friendship prospers…






Computers, Petroglyphs and The Impermanence of Information and how to solve it.

Petroglyphs record what the people saw and how they lived.

In September of 2016, I had the opportunity to visit a series of thirteen thousand year old petroglyphs in the Nevada desert. These amazing symbols depict as yet to be understood writings of a native American people who have long since vanished and whose modern descendants, the Paiute nation, stand guard over and who hold them in high esteem.

My family had some contact with the Paiute people near Big Pine, California back in the 1950s when my teenage mother befriended a woman named Sarah who my mother related as being the head of the Paiute nation ( I am taking my mother’s word on this and only relating a family story ) and who loved that my mother would bring her trout, took her shopping and sought to help her in her day to day life and just being a friend. Sarah, in turn, declared our family to be friends of the Paiute. And with that, our family was a friend to their nation and hopefully I will one day get to say hello to them again and thank them for being kind to my mother. Be that as it may, the Paiutes showed us they value their ancestors and wish to preserve the ancient records now under their care.

Petroglyphs at Winnemucca Lake – By Larry V. Benson, USGS [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
The ruins were amazing to see in the early September light as we photographed them from a distance out of respect for the laws protecting them and also sheer respect for the monument and message they represent. In fact, a number of strange phenomena took place that early morning and I still am mystified by some of what we saw. I hope to ask the Paiutes themselves about these happenings because I’ve never experienced anything like them in all of my travels into the paranormal and unusual. Perhaps there truly is an ancient Spirit to places like this. I believe that once our peaceful intentions were understood, all the odd happenings ceased and we peacefully admired the ancient writings for quite awhile before the heat drove us out of the area.

The Egyptian Pyramid complex near Cairo

There are many ancient monuments on this planet. And of these, only a few can match the claim that this set of petroglyphs have in terms of sheer age and staying power. The fact that these symbols are still here, thirteen thousand years since their creation, is a testament to the environment and the vision of their creators.

What are these people trying to tell us in the future? Was this only for them to read or for distant generations to learn from?

What is vexing is the MEANING of these petroglyphs. It is clear that these symbols meant something to these people and they meant enough that the expense of carving these into the rocks near the dry lake east of the aptly named Pyramid Lake in Nevada was well worth it to them.

That is the danger with petroglyphs. Their original meanings can be lost. Without an appropriate index or Rosetta Stone translation tool to ascribe meaning to what is being said, it leaves future generations grasping at straws as to what is being communicated. Some, like myself, believe a number of these symbols depict events and things these ancient people witnessed. Astronomical events, strange weather, day-to-day life commentary and… perhaps… even UFOs and mystical phenomena.

There is one standout message that these ancient Native Americans did manage to get across to us. And it is that they felt compelled to share their lives with We Of The Future and which made it through time and space for us to consider and wonder about.

It is as if they screamed We mattered and we want you to remember us! across the millennia and  sit smug in the knowledge that they succeeded.

And with that, I began to think about my own 40-plus year IT career working with computer systems of all types.  I wondered about the ability of our modern civilization to store and retrieve information that comes so naturally to our modern computers being able to certainly outstrip and outclass the relatively few symbols of a Native American people who have long disappeared…  Modern computers trump stone age symbolism and writings… Right?

We live by our digital world, but it too will come crashing down one day…

Not so fast there Pilgrim… In fact, Native American, Egyptian, Mesopotamian and other civilizations were able to record amazing levels of detail about their lives and stories  that are impressive histories of our planet and the Human race itself. And they did it with chisels and symbols that have stood for centuries. Far beyond what our modern electronic records are capable of.

A hard disc drive opened for viewing it’s internal parts.

Information storage and processing these days are so cheap that we hardly think about what a wonderful thing it is. And for all of it’s power, it suffers from a variety of weaknesses that threaten our civilization in ways we cannot begin to yet understand.

For one, it is notable that with information becoming so transient and temporary in nature that “truth” as we once knew it is a much more fleeting thing than it was for us even thirty years ago. The rate of change in society and our sciences is advancing at a rate no single human can keep up with.

It isn’t a matter of IF an asteroid or comet will hit. It is a matter of WHEN it will arrive unannounced and cause mass devastation.

Secondly, it is this massive electronic infrastructure itself that is subject to incredible destruction at the hands of both human agencies and natural forces that is driving me to write this article.  Imagine an asteroid or comet strike on the Earth where, if such a thing occurred, a massive electromagnetic pulse would immediately send humanity back to the 1870s or even earlier in terms of our technological capabilities. We would have some power in the form of generators and perhaps a few motors and old fashioned telegraph gear, but forget computers. We would be back to pen and paper and no more Amazon deliveries. And a tweet? We’d be back to using messenger pigeons. Think on that one Twitter!

One day, another massive solar flare like the 1859 Carrington Event which destroyed telegraph wires and set fires will occur. The next event this large will destroy our modern life as we know it.

Similarly, the often cited disaster of a solar flare doing much the same thing to a huge part of the planet would leave our civilization badly wounded.  The 1859 Carrington Event was so massive it damaged telegraph equipment and set fires when it occurred. If such a flare hit the Earth today,  the subsequent damage and incredible loss of life due to famine, plagues, uprisings and war would eclipse anything the human race has met with in recorded history. Only super-volcanic eruptions and floods which are recorded in our historical  record come close to the damage a global or near global electromagnetic or EMP pulse would do.

Even without an EMP pulse, solar flare or a nuclear war, our ability to retain and store information reliably is pitifully weak. In fact, it is laughable.

Astronaut descending the Lunar Lander (LEM) to the lunar surface.

“Prove it” you ask? On July 20th, 1969, human beings landed on the moon and our species became one capable of landing on another planetary body for the first time. And one would think that our ability to retain the original recordings of Neil Armstrong descending the ladder to step on the lunar surface would have been a priority.

Think again. NASA lost the original video and had to depend on secondary copies because in the 1980s, they erased the tapes and reused them for other purposes. And with countless missions under their belts, stories circulated of literally thousands of boxes of unread reels of telemetry from deep space probes, rotting in hallways that revealed the extent of information overload that threatens to overwhelm us as a civilization.

The ultimate cause of all this waste? It likely was because of budget cuts and a sense of moving on to the next mission rather than keep data that might still be of value. And this isn’t a dig at NASA. They are an amazing organization, but they struggle with the overload like everyone else.

I will reiterate the point I’m making:

Our ability to make information and record it far outstrips our ability to utilize, preserve and retain it.

The folks in the intelligence world know of what I speak. It isn’t the ability to get the information that is tough. It is the ability to get the RIGHT information when you need it. And to sift through the ever increasing stream of data is proving to be a massively complex problem. Never mind finding it again when you need it later. It is here today, gone tomorrow.

I used to be a computer operator and one of my jobs in the day was backup of data. We used a rule of thumb in the days of 9-track tape that said that our magnetic tape requirements would go up four-fold every three years. Think about that. The storage requirements for information are exploding at rates that are staggering and if my old rule still holds true, then we are in for some real expense in trying to record all the data we are attempting to do.

The avalanche of data with our data collection systems being able to totally overwhelm us is well documented. And I only mention this in passing to support where we are going with this article.

So what HAS worked for human civilization for information storage as we know it?

The BEST that our historical civilizations have had to work with is the old reliable that lasts for hundreds of years with the right storage conditions.  Books, scrolls and even leather skins with symbols and writing etched on them.

But even these wonderful storage systems for information  don’t come close to the sheer staying power of the etched Nevada petroglyphs I personally visited in the northern deserts of that great state.

Civilizations come and go. We need to plan ahead for what will surely collapse our civilization.

So… We have two extremes. On one side, information stored on rock that is 13,000 years old and yet we can barely understand a fraction what is being said to us.

On the other side:  Twenty-first century information storage systems that cannot successfully store and retain data for the long haul and which are susceptible to the slightest disruption from astronomical or human caused disasters or wars.

Even DVDs have only a 30 year shelf life. Data this dense needs to be refreshed often to prevent loss…

It is absolutely imperative that we decide to do something about this situation now and take action to find a good middle ground by taking advantage of the best of what the Petroglyph Writers were talking about and what our modern computer technology is capable of doing.

My thoughts revolve around three key properties of long-term information storage that I feel are absolutely important for communicating to those in the future:

  1. 1. Choice of a storage medium that can stand the test of time for thousands if not millions of years.
  2. 2. The choice of WHAT TO SAY (the payload of value) to the people of the future.
  3. 3 Where to place the messages.

The first problem, that of choosing something that will outlast all electronic infrastructure and yet have enough detail (information density) to be useful to our descendants is absolutely key. A separate sub-problem to be overcome is HOW to pass the meaning across in a language that can be easily understood by the casual observer in the far future but which has scales of density that would speak well to a technological society that would be able to absorb larger amounts of data from the media that the low density symbols are etched on.

Without getting too detailed and going off in the weeds with a heavy technical discussion, I feel that crystalline technologies like Hitachi’s new quartz storage system using low-density storage of information etched on crystal sheets carved at the scale where a human eye can read them combined with high-density storage of binary data embedded in the same crystalline sheets so that eventually a high-tech civilization can read them has real benefits from using this dual-nature modern petroglyph that we can leave behind for our descendants.

Hitachi permanent quartz storage system technology is a reality and can store data for potentially a 100 million years or more.

We would need to place symbols in the low density etchings to tell a high-tech society how to read the embedded high density technology.

Crystal technology has a real advantage in that it is something that can stand the test of time for literally millions of years and is relatively inert chemically if kept in the correct environmental conditions. Rock is the next best storage medium, but is subject to weathering and water damage if left in the open. Perhaps a combination of the two would work well, but for now, I’m leaning to crystals as the ideal storage medium.

A crystal skull, made from quartz. Could it store information in it’s makeup and be used at a later date? And did the ancients use these for just such a purpose?

In fact, some people insist that Crystal Skulls from ancient times have a number of the properties we are discussing but which we have not figured out how to access for the high-density and high-value information.

These skulls exhibit unusual features in that they should not exist given the way they are carved and the unusual phenomena that accompany them are well documented and indicative that these may even be a form of crystalline life form/computer all rolled into one package. However, we are looking for a more mundane and simplified  means of passing information with our existing technologies and Crystal Skulls are not yet something I see Hitachi or any other company embedding information into!

Returning to our simple messaging system we are building: For these messages to be of any value, a manual and easy instructions for the right minds of the future need to be simple enough to interpret to get to the good information within, otherwise the entire effort is a failure.

What do we tell the Future?

As for what to say on these crystal tablets? I believe that the smart thing to do is to consult with the experts in petroglyph technology themselves and approach the Native Americans, European tribal peoples, the Egyptians, Far Eastern tribal peoples and the Australian Aboriginal peoples and learn from them what was important for them to record in the first place. They knew what they were doing when they created these libraries and it would pay very well to incorporate their wisdom, opinions and ideas into a future storage technology to help our species over the march of time.

It makes sense to bring together a First Nations people, or perhaps a wide confederation of them together to get a concerted input to storing their histories and thoughts on life and their stories into this modern form of petroglyph that can preserve their history for what could be seen as “forever”. It would take a team of tribal elders, scientists, IT experts and language experts to create such a custom petroglyph system that would embrace their thinking and express it in the quartz crystal media. Of course, this same process could apply to many cultures wishing to preserve their histories in the same fashion.

Secondly, it makes sense to inventory the key information our civilization has picked up for the last several thousand years and devise a system of passing on valuable information from a wide range of subject matter. Imagine if we could give a boost to a future civilization by passing on what we have learned as an investment for the species itself. Subjects from science, philosophy, spiritual topics, human rights and even to communicate a sense of wonder as to why we exist and what we felt about Creation when we wrote all of this down are natural topics to consider for such a “Book of the Future” to pass to our descendants. An even smarter move would be to record the full DNA profiles of not only our own species but that of as much of our animal and plant life as possible into the record for future study and even potential use

There is one other category of people to consider in all of this as well. And that is the chance that non-human creatures with intellect might find these records long after humans are extinct. Even then, it would pay dividends to have them know of our existence and to, as I mentioned earlier, the possible recreation of human life from DNA stored in the tablets if these aliens should so choose to use to recreate our species.

So this brings us to the final topic.

Where to place the tablets?

For storage on Earth itself, the obvious choices revolve around placing the records in stable areas, free of water and which our best geological estimates feel will be free of being endangered by any catastrophe for at least a million years. One would naturally want to place many identical copies of such records in many locations on the planet to insure that they do not all get destroyed either though human induced disaster or natural disasters.

Modern seed storage vaults have addressed this question by placing their “message to the future” in the form of seeds into cold storage in the coldest places on the planet. They have been doing what we are talking about for years now. And their criteria for choosing good places to store valuable genetic information can be a good pattern for storage of data for the future of Humanity.

Using geological features that are attractive to explorers and yet a little hard to reach would be a good way to keep the records safe. Placing them in already existing structures like the Pyramids in Egypt and the many other pyramid structures around the globe would be logical choices as well. After all, making use of what our ancestors already have designed and built which have been around for thousands of years is certainly a matter of good economics.

Such structures are composed of stone and can certainly handle the effects of shielding from EMP and other disasters that could truly save and protect the information we are trying to put forward to our descendants in the future.

Storage in Space

A “Book To The Future” is not conscripted just to the Earth. It makes sense to spread this message far and wide with as many of our space probes as possible and also as a spacecraft unto itself. What do I mean by this?

We stand on the cusp of being able to colonize the solar system. And with that act of breaching the Earth’s boundaries, we become an interplanetary species and will be able to affect multiple worlds. We should be able to find places, but in certain points in space itself and on stable worlds with ice-cold temperatures and little to no geologic activity to store knowledge bases for perpetuity.

Star Travel… Messages in a Bottle

Going back to our DNA storage discussion earlier, we also can design a series of spacecraft to be shot out of the solar system, like bottles to be floated in the great ocean of space, to carry our history and knowledge to other worlds and star systems.

Getting these packages into the vast reaches of the solar system shouldn’t be too hard. Adding them to deep space probes or even miniaturizing them to use the solar wind to escape the solar system and be spread into interstellar space is likely a very easy prospect. The  only challenge is to make them noticeable to a passing spacecraft in some manner in order to retrieve them and harvest their message and content. Perhaps a beacon that sends out a radio signal at regular intervals and uses background radiation to power the beacon or some as yet-to-be developed technology.

DNA is the ultimate message in a bottle…

And if we have DNA  samples in digital form of as much of Earth life as possible, including ourselves, aboard these craft, we stand the chance of traversing the galaxy in a form that doesn’t require power but which might see us survive and be recreated in another far off part of the Milky Way. It’s the genes that count. Not sending individual people in suspended animation at great expense into the void of space.

Nature is  a great teacher and if one were to listen to Her examples, such as the dandelion that uses its parachute-style seed distribution method to survive and thrive…

Immortality of a sort. Economical and simple to do. Perhaps that is too much to ask of a technical society to try, but then again, the alternative for us is to simply embrace extinction at some point.

Personally, I’d go with the star seeding and hedge our bets.

Sometimes the simple solution is the best one of all.